Already a Member?
Become a Member
 
Entertainment Articles
In This Issue
We're going to the chapel!
The road of a young actress
These guys do more than merely go bump in the night
Anne Hathaway, Kate Hudson, Gary Oldman, Cam Gigandet
Mickey Rourke, Marisa Tomei, Evan Rachel Wood
My city screams. She is my lover. And I am her spirit.
Winslet and DiCaprio, together again!
Hollywood Should Take to Heart
Get your date books out, this is important
Take a look at some of the best romcom's of the year!
 
Entertainment Articles
In This Issue » Entertainment » Spider-Man 3

Spider-Man 3

One comic geeks dissapointed review.

Written by: J. Bellocchio – Posted: Fri May 4th, 2007
Tools

Among my group of friends, I'm probably the biggest "comic geek" around. Any movies based on a graphic novel or series? I'm first in line. So it wasn't surprising that I rallied a group together to attend the midnight showing of Spider-Man 3, what has been rumored to be the last in the trilogy. Though I have never really been a huge fan of the movie franchise, I figured, this is the third and last one, you know they're going to pull out the stops and make it one of the best superhero movies ever. Unfortunately, it was right up there with disappointment along with Superman Returns.

First of all, I have never been a fan of Tobey Maguire as Spidey. While I think he's a phenomenal actor in roles such as Cider House Rules, I couldn't help but wonder why they chose someone who always seem so serious to play NYC's favorite web slinger, who even in his darkest hour will make jokes while kicking someone in the face. Kirsten Dunst, who plays Mary Jane Watson, is someone I've also never liked for the role. "MJ" in the comics is a strong, stubborn, independent woman, and considered by many fans to be one of the hottest women in the comic universe. I just never got that from Dunst.

While they both do a decent job of tackling the roles, it just didn't feel like I was watching the Spider-Man I grew up with. I know directors feel the need to make movies that have a different feeling to appease the regular movie crowd and die hard comic fans, but Maguire and Dunst should not have been the actors chosen. I didn't even feel there was any good chemistry amongst them and felt I was being forced to believe these two are in love. Even scenes in the movie play off the fact that you can't believe Mary Jane and Peter are together, which should have been amusing, not make you say "yes, you're right."
Post Your Comment
To leave a comment, click here to login or sign up
  
View Comments
Well I saw it, it was a great movie, even better than the first
one and the second one.
But I think that the director could skip a few scenes;) that
wasn't a part of the movie at all and a bit dissapointing or
hilarious.
As I agree with Bellochio, the cast isn't casted the right way but
I think that they still did a great job.
It's soo different from the original comics that, if you like
spiderman of marvel characters, you shouldn't compare this
storyline to the comics storyline because it's so much different.

Thereby I think that the sandman is a good choice for the last
spidey movie because it explains and rolls up the storie about
uncle Ben.

So afterall I did like the movie but that's personal, I had a nice
guy sitting next to me, who is my bf now :P
obviously if ur some kind of a obsessed spiderman comic book fan,
you wouldnt like this movie. so i loved it! it was everything a
movie should be. FUNNY, filled with ACTION, a LOVE triangle and
tears !
I thought it was very stereotypical, but in a suprisingly fun way.
I never got bored, ad was entertained the entire time. I don't
know why, really. Most my friends thought it was boring and
unorganized. But it was really one of the best moviegoing
experiences I've had. It reminded me of cartoons, where EVERYTHING
happens, and it builds up to this huge climax.Most of us got bored
of that quite some time ago, and it's become despised in the movie
an TV world. But dispite how overly "perfect" the ending (and most
of the movie) was, Spiderman 3 pulled it off for me.
I didn't like it at all, i think they try way to hard. I hope they
do not make a 4th
THATS A REALLY RIMP PICTURE AND MOVIE
I'm easy to please when it comes movies but this movie was hugely
disappointing. I just didn't get it. I was bored halfway through.
Spider-Man 3 was AWESOME! I've seen all three and I love them all!
I've already seen it three times! haha It's a great movie...some
lame parts (like The Mask-wannabe-jazz club scene), lol, but, it
definitely made me laugh and I was definitely on the edge of my
seat during the fight scenes and when Flint turns into SandMan!
Great movie! Everyone should see it! :)
this review is the reason potc 3 will be SO much better =]

you hit the nail on the head!! i walked out feeling like i hadn't
watched a spiderman movie. i've been saying that it felt like they
replaced peter with someone other than tobey and this "new actor"
decided to take the character in a different direction. i didn't
like it :/
I loved it. I loved every minute. I'll admit Dunst has never
struck me as the best in it (in any of the movies) but then
again..I'm sure there are a lot worse actresses that could've been
cast. Honestly. I've been a huge fan of Maguire since I first saw
him in the movie "Pleasantville". LoL! I've never known much about
spiderman (never read the comics) but watching the movies has put
Spiderman at number one for me as far as marvel is concerned..and
I really don't think they could've done that with an actor other
than Maguire.
James Franco. I absolutely thought he was perfect in all 3 movies.
Gotta make a bit of a disagreement tho...he is in no way (in my
opinion) any kind of candy. I'm sorry..just...no.
Church and Grace. Brilliantly cast, I think. Altho...I have to
admit that it was hard to see Brock come on the screen and not see
the "That 70 show" bell-bottoms. LoL! He was really good in the
movie tho. Definately not enough "Venom" time in the movie. I do
think that they might could've saved Sandman for another time, but
I don't think having 3 villains made it too crowded. On the
contrary I think they did a very good job of juggling it all in.
And of course my absolute favorite: JK Simmons. I watched SM 2.1
the other day which basically has extra scenes on the second
movie. Very funny part with Mr. Jameson. LoL. Of course he didn't
disappoint in the 3rd movie.

Like I said tho...all in all I really enjoyed the movie. =)
Dude this movie was something aweful. They totally killed the
series, there is no way for them to continue making movies, which
i guess is what they wanted to do...but come now, if you know
anything about the comics you will be horribly dissappointed!
Plus the emo scene in the middle made me want to slit my own
wrists. The whole jazz club dancing scene was horrid. Ugh what a
dissappointing movie
My boyfriend and I went to see it last night. We loved it! I cried
five times haha the love scenes got me and then the part where he
forgave the sand dude for killing his uncle.. I'm such a sap. I
know.

There were also a lot of Biblical themes to it.

GREAT MOVIE!
The movie was great! And as for the "emo" look...that was the
black alien suit that brings out the worst characteristics of its
host. They were trying to make him look scary almost...didn't
really work because he's not that intimidating, but he handled it
really well. And Kirsten Dunst is totally hott! :^)
i thought it was amazing....really...totally worth the money and
waiting in line to get in :D
and James Franco is sooo sexy yum
The author's views on this movie are almost the same as mine...so
rare;)
This is going to contain spoilers.

I don't know what is wrong with everyone. Spiderman 3 was
definitely below par. The storyline was almost copycat of POTC -
and by that I mean they make it as complicated as possible until
it almost doesn't make sense. The difference between POTC and
Spiderman is that POTC mastered that successfully and Spiderman's
plot just became "overstuffed." Sure, the computer animation was
cool and all, but the acting was not that great. & they gave
Spiderman an 'emo-boy' look, which was perhaps the most random and
pointless part of the movie. Definitely not a movie to waste money
on to see.
Yea, I actually got to go to the U.S. premiere the Monday before
the movie came out in theaters. I have to say I like this one the
best out of the three, but it's a little too long and too many
story lines all crammed together. Oh and also Kirsten Dunst is
not hot. Sorry. lol
i think this movie was so damn cool and i dont even like spider
man but my nephew wanted 2 go so i had 2 take him cuz i wa
babysittin and when i went it was raw
I saw SpiderMan 3 with my 6 yr old sister and my 8 yr old brother.
I liked part 3 the best out of the other two, SpiderMan1 was good
but this one had alot more action and it was funnier...like Tobey
Maguire thinking he was a Hot Shot..Lol it just made me laugh
watching him walking the streets and dancing at the Jazz Club,
even my sister said "Is he trying to be Cool?" Kirsten could have
played her part better but yet i dont like her much as an actrist
anyway..Shes just to dull/dry ..As for James Franco as a Vilen
...Can u Say EyeCandy...hes the Main Reason i even began watching
the SpiderMan Movies... I believe the Movie could have been betta
but it wasnt Bad it was without a doubt worth my money...and once
Again can i say James Franco is a Hottie even with the left side
of his face Burnt :P
Dat movie wuz so hot i mean...... u don kno how bad i want the
game now... i mean the graphics the characters wuz beasty......
i've seen every single spider-man movie but dat one wuz tha
best.... and i'm tellin u there's goin 2 be another spider-man
movie.... because from the way dat movie ended it tells u it's
going to be another movie
I found the movie to be great with graphics but horrible in
acting...i'm done with spiderman...Venom was the most interesting
me...and as far as tears...i was actually laughing from my friends
snide comments throughout the sad parts :-p but over all THIS WAS
THE BEST of ALL of the 3 so far
Peter Parker danced...MJ sang...and hey, even Harry did a little
twist...

Needless to say, I was wondering how these ideas sounded good on
paper in the first place!
I thought it was great. There are onl;y a few complaints from me.
Why put Gwen Stacy in now? She just made MJ jealous for awhile and
gave Eddie another reason to hate Peter. Second, Sandman was
awesome, but it's a little much saying that HE killed Uncle Ben
all of a sudden. He could have waited for another time. They
should have stuck with Venom, who is, for me, the second scariest
villain in the comics (I think the scariest is Carnage). He wasn't
given enough time to really do much, but still managed to freak me
out. He definitely should have gotten more time. Another thing:
Bad Spidey was OK-ish, but what's with the emo hairdo?! Not good
on Tobey Maguire. P.S. I think all the roles were cast PERFECTLY.
:P
There are so many mixed reviews about this film. I went to see it
on the day it came out and I thought it was pretty decent. Yup,
think they shouldn't have tried to pack in 3 villans into one
film, as it's better to develop the story of just one villan per
film. Also, you have the whole "dark" spidey to deal with also.
Overall though, it's a pretty good film. Nice way to wile away the
afternoon. But do agree that the "dark" Peter Parker was just
funny...the whole Saturday Night Fever vibe walking down the
street...funny! But nice to have Topher Grace as eye candy, though
his teeth do get weird later on..ewww...
I hear so many opposite reviews, I still want to see it for my
own, I like comics a lot and never really start comparing because
normally the movielines are not as good as the comics'storylines
because when the comics takes 12 years to explain something ( or a
year or whatever) it's hard to put that into a 130min movie.
Or on emotional base, it's the same thing.
You see characters grow in comics over the years, it's hard to put
that in 1,2 or 3 movies or even more.
I still want to see it though, maybe I'll put down my review:P

i really liked spidey3... i cant really compare it to the first,
but it was definitely better than the 2nd. i thought james franco
was amazing.i wasnt a fan of kirsten dunst though either. the
topher grace plot was a good addition and i loved the end..i
cried, too.
Superman 3 has got to be in the top 10 worst movies of all time.
Cheesey story line, Cheesey cliches, Kirsten Dunst lip singing and
peter parker having an EMO fringe creating a 70s rivival trying to
boogie down the street.
Good things: James Franco and Topher Grace as eye candy.
You do know Dunst and McGuire dated, right?

I heard it was pretty crappy.. but I'm still going to go see it
for myself.
About the humor. My husband was playing Marvel: Ultimate Alliance
a while back and in the game, Spider-Man keeps making all these
wise-cracks and jokes. Yet, you never really see ANY of this in
the movies. And I agree that his humor is one of the coolest
things about Spider-man.
sm 3 sucked so much, it was just really bad
movies are adaptations not true reproductions of the material they
come from.
I definitely enjoyed watching Spiderman 3 compared to Spiderman 1
because there was less plot and more action. Also, I laughed so
hard during spiderman's 'emo' phase, when he went through his
dance scene. It was more rediculous than anything else, but it was
hilarious!

Downside: Kristen Dunst sings; never liked her as an actress
anyways.

GO see this movie! :)
Hmm...I couldn't get into the comic books, but I love the
Spiderman movies (and the Sat morning cartoon I watched as a kid).
I think I am gonna enjoy it, and I am a fan of both Maguire and
Dunst. You make some interesting points in your review--nicely
done. (And thanks for not spoiling us!)