Already a Member?
Become a Member
 
Entertainment Articles
In This Issue
We're going to the chapel!
The road of a young actress
These guys do more than merely go bump in the night
Anne Hathaway, Kate Hudson, Gary Oldman, Cam Gigandet
Mickey Rourke, Marisa Tomei, Evan Rachel Wood
My city screams. She is my lover. And I am her spirit.
Winslet and DiCaprio, together again!
Hollywood Should Take to Heart
Get your date books out, this is important
Take a look at some of the best romcom's of the year!
 
Entertainment Articles
In This Issue » Entertainment » Jumper: Might Make You Jump...

Jumper: Might Make You Jump...

Out of your seat and to an exit, that is.

Written by: A. Niranjan – Posted: Mon Feb 25th, 2008
Tools


Jumper, like the title of the film, can be summed up in one word: mediocre. The theatre was packed even though it was not opening night of the film, yet this particular critic was left, frankly, bored. Movies are expensive these days, and it has to be said, that audiences deserve more for their ticket than Jumper delivered.

The cast was star studded, with names such as Hayden Christensen, Rachel Bilson, Diane Lane, and even Samuel L. Jackson in the cast. Though the acting itself was at no particular the fault, the plot definitely could have used a little more effort. If the writers were not on strike while writing this script, then there is simply no excuse!

Basically, the movie consists of a teen, David, who discovers that he can teleport from any place to another. He discovers that he can rob banks and then lives off of this, rather than ever get an education to do an actual job. Note, also, that he is not a super-hero. He never thinks to use his powers to do something noble or for something other than for his own self-interest.
Post Your Comment
To leave a comment, click here to login or sign up
  
View Comments
This underdeveloped plot and many plot holes is just another
excuse for Hollywood to make even worse sequels of this movie. The
way this movie was made was designed exactly for that.
Such a shame, since the concept for the film had great potential.
i liked it but yeah there was a lot of explaining that needed to
happen...like why exactly are they killing jumpers? i mean it's
slightly given in the movie, but there is no real concept to why
things are happening as they are.
Only reason why the movie was great was because Hayden was good
eye candy..
http://thatslife8.blogspot.com/
I saw it and I agree with the critic here. The plot was not
developed. Nothing is really explained at all. You leave wondering
why anything happened the way it did and you have no real answers.
It was a very awesome concept and if they had focused more on
explaining things, I would have loved the movie but there's just
no real substance to it. I wish they would have given the plot
more detail, it really had potential to be an awesome movie. Maybe
they will make a sequel and actually explain what they left out in
this one.
I've always wondered why exactly there are movie critics. I have
yet to see this movie but a group of four very good friends of
mine saw it. The group consists of 3 boys and a girl.
They all said the movie was awesome.
Which therefore brings me back to my frist statement.
Why are there movie critics?
Everyone has different taste. Therefore you can't ever say a movie
is "bad" because as it may be very uninteresting to you..to
someone else it may turn out to be their favorite movie.

You write really well though.
hmm and i was looking foward to watching this movie. aw
well...i'll watch it anyway.