Already a Member?
Become a Member
 
Latest News Comments
They look like brother and sister. Joe's cute, but Belle's one plain lame Jane!
News: Joe Jonas Gets a New Girl...
Posted: 28 Minutes Ago
The only thing "immoral," shock78rpm, are those who hurt others. I just hope the US doesn'...
News: 9 Men Jailed in Senegal F...
Posted: 2 Hours Ago
Gaza strip also has humans I suppose. Dont you agree
News: Israel Agrees to Open Sup...
Posted: 3 Hours Ago
haha...wrong Hudson
News: Kate Hudson Happy for Lan...
Posted: 5 Hours Ago
That's so awful.
News: Concern for California's ...
Posted: 6 Hours Ago
 
The News
News » Entertainment » FCC appeals Janet Jackson case to Supreme Court

FCC appeals Janet Jackson case to Supreme Court

Submitted by: SilverSafpheir    Posted: Sat Nov 22nd , 2008
Original source: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/11/21/AR2008112102700....
Tools
The Federal Communications Commission has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review the indecency case over Janet Jackson's breast-baring performance at the 2004 Super Bowl. The FCC this week appealed a ruling by the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia, saying that court was wrong to throw out the case and a $550,000 fine against CBS Corp. in July. The appellate court cited the FCC practice of not considering objectionable images indecent if they are "fleeting." In Jackson's halftime show at the 2004 Super Bowl, which spawned the case, she briefly flashed a breast as she performed with Justin Timberlake.

View Comments
I think the rule that "required a profanity be repeated before it is deemed indecent" should apply to images, too. She didn't do it on purpose. It was purely an accident so it should be let go. If the public has moved on, the FCC should move on, too.
Posted: Sat Nov 22nd , 2008
holy horse hides. I had no clue this was still going on. Who cares? And I don't mean in the sense that this isn't news. I mean that the "incident" was 4 years ago! Why is this still dragging on?
Posted: Sat Nov 22nd , 2008