1. Welcome to kiwibox

    We're happy that you are part of our community. Please take a few minutes discover how kiwibox works.

    You want to explore kiwibox on your own? No problem. You can easily restart the tour at any time by using the sidebar if you change your mind.

  2. Logo

    A click on the kiwibox Logo brings you back to the startpage. Besides a menue with a lot of useful links opens if you mouse over.

  3. Notifications

    You may find all of your news, friendship requests and messages up right in the navigation bar.

  4. Settings

    Just mouse over a post and the gearwheel will appear. Here you'll find all the settings for your news.

  5. Supermodul

    The supermodul summarizes various contents. Enjoy exploring!

swankychum598

swankychum598   , 30

from Long Beach

How To Obtain In Form Without The Gym

Every year thousands of Americans produce a pledge to get in shape starting inside the New Year.   The following morning when I woke up, my entire body was sore.   It reminded me of the cardio and full body weight exercises that I did as a wrestler in high school. Every year a large number of Americans make a pledge to obtain fit starting inside the New Year.

The approach to defend your poster is with a poster body.   Don\'t mess around spending hours and hours with boring treadmill running.   Don\'t https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qzap99B7XTE mess around spending hours and hours with boring treadmill running.   Try doing three or four different short movements throughout the day.

5988056321785355704.jpg

No, you don\'t. You must explore deep down inside yourself why you want to get back in shape.  I\'m never not disappointed to know them apologize for sucking wind and then say, \"Man, I really must get into shape!\"  The answer is, no, you really don\'t. There are plenty of companies the ones out there after your hard earned money with every little if any regard for the well-being.

6153480589005993448.jpg

And even as all know, results take time to suit your needs to be seen.   They are both very literal things.   They are both very literal things. For more information visit: Pavement Sign.

Your actual exercises sessions needs to be short a relatively intense. Super supplements, magic potions, powerful pills are not the answer.   Starting out at 200$ this small elliptical machine is often available for sale on Amazon for (link above) for under 100$. There are distinct designs http://www.fitnessmagazine.com/weight-loss/tips/how-to-lose-fat-for-good/ to pick from. It was originally d for your pregnant woman to keep her muscles strengthened through her pregnancy and also during and after birth.

 If you have never exercised inside a gym I recommend finding a personal trainer or strength coach.   The very nature of this exercise will draw you into exercising to your full potential. Use a chair to complete sit ups to strong arms and chest, and to get a strong back, turn around as in the big event you were sitting within the chair and support the seat along with your hands and lower yourself towards the ground. Buy Now(price https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qzap99B7XTE as of Sep 7, 2014).


Senate to vote on existence of manmade global warming, again

Senate to vote on existence of manmade global warming, again

During the debate on a bill that would force the President to approve the Keystone XL oil pipeline, Senate Democrats plan to offer an amendment that would put senators on the record regarding their recognition of basic mainstream climate science findings.

In short, the amendment, offered by Independent Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont, asks senators to agree or disagree that "climate change is real" and is "caused by human activities," among other findings.

See also: Japan confirms 2014 was Earth's warmest year

The amendment is similar to one offered by Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) in 2014. Klobuchar's amendment was never voted on. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) cleared the way for Democratic amendments to the current bill on Tuesday, when he told reporters that he would not block any amendments. The final Senate vote on the pipeline is expected Friday.

6104085228383624198.jpg

Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee member Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., in Washington on Thursday, Jan. 8, 2015.

Virtually all mainstream climate scientists would likely agree with most, if not all, of Sanders' amendment, which is technically known as a "Sense of the Senate" resolution. It would not require that any actions be taken by the federal government, but rather would put senators -- including several newly elected Republicans -- on the record about this particular issue.

6104085238387961714.jpg

Demonstrators opposing the Keystone XL oil pipeline hold banners outside the office of Rep. Brad Ashford, D-Neb., in Omaha, Neb., Tuesday, Jan. 13, 2015.

6104085254013371790.jpg

Image: Nati Harnik/Associated Press

The Democrats intend to use the vote during the upcoming 2016 presidential campaign, when several senators, including Rand Paul of Kentucky, Ted Cruz of Texas and Marco Rubio of Florida, are expected to run. Each of them have expressed doubts that manmade global warming exists, with Rubio going so far as to say he is "not a scientist" in an attempt to address the issue.

There is, however, language in the Sanders amendment that some mainstream climate scientists might disagree with, which is the statement that climate change "has already caused devastating problems in the United States and around the world."

Based on the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's (IPCC) voluminous climate science reports, the most recent of which came out in 2014, it's possible to both recognize the reality of global warming and also conclude that the most devastating impacts are yet to come, with relatively murky links between climate change and disasters in the U.S. to date. The IPCC reports draws clear https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SeXGDDqxg34 connections between climate change and more severe heat waves and heavy precipitation events, but it's not obvious that impacts seen to date have been "disastrous."

This language could give some Republican climate skeptics a scientifically defensible way to oppose the amendment.

The resolution also states:

"A brief window of opportunity exists before the United States and the entire planet suffer irreparable harm; and it is imperative that the United States transform its energy system away from fossil fuels and toward energy efficiency and http://www.pilatesanytime.com/ sustainable energy as rapidly as possible."

Another amendment submitted Tuesday evening by Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) would simply state: "It is the sense of the Senate that climate change is real and not a hoax." Senators may decide to vote on Whitehouse's resolution instead of Sanders', but either way senators would be forced to go on record about climate science findings.

This is not the first time that senators have voted on the existence of global warming, either. In 2005, for example, the Senate approved a "Sense of the Senate" resolution from then-Senator Jeff Bingaman (D-N.M.), which put the Senate on record that global warming is real and that it is necessary to slow, stop and reverse the growth in greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide. An attempt to defeat the amendment failed by a vote of 44 to 53, with 12 Republicans joining Democrats to support the amendment.

A decade later, with the scientific findings far more solid than they were in 2005, there is a strikingly sharper political divide on the mere existence of global warming, let alone the solutions to it, with some senators, such as John McCain of Arizona, having switched their positions during the intervening years.

In the new Republican-led Congress, the debate over the contentious Keystone Pipeline is mainly about scoring points on both sides of the aisle.

Keystone would carry tar sands oil from Alberta southward into the U.S., to join up with an existing pipeline that begins in Cushing, Oklahoma. From there, the oil would flow south to the Gulf of Mexico, where it would most likely find its way to the global market, rather than being burned in the U.S. (Another amendment Democrats plan to offer to the Keystone bill would prohibit the oil from being exported.)

Republicans are seeking to put political pressure on the White House to approve the pipeline, which they say would create jobs. The House voted in favor of Keystone for https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SeXGDDqxg34 a 10th time earlier this week, but President Obama has threatened to veto any bill that forces his hand on the issue. The State Department is still reviewing the proposed project, and environmentalists have staunchly opposed it, turning it into a litmus test of the White House's commitment to fighting climate change.

Another factor in pipeline politics is tumbling oil prices that have reached lows not seen since at least 2009. These prices are forcing Canadian oil companies to cut back on their projects and shed jobs, potentially killing the Keystone project even if it were approved.

For example, on Tuesday, Suncor, which is the largest Canadian oil company by market value, announced plans to cut $1 billion in spending and 1,000 jobs during the next year https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SeXGDDqxg34 due to the drop in oil prices, which has made many drilling projects in Canada's Tar Sands of Alberta unprofitable.

http://mashable.com/2015/01/13/senate-vote-manmade-global-warming/


Senate to vote on existence of manmade global warming, again

Senate to vote on existence of manmade global warming, again

During the debate on a bill that would force the President to approve the Keystone XL oil pipeline, Senate Democrats plan to offer an amendment that would put senators on the record regarding their recognition of basic mainstream climate science findings.

In short, the amendment, offered by Independent Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont, asks senators to agree or disagree that "climate change is real" and is "caused by human activities," among other findings.

See also: Japan confirms 2014 was Earth's warmest year

The amendment is similar to one offered by Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) in 2014. Klobuchar's amendment was never voted on. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) cleared the way for Democratic amendments to the current bill on Tuesday, when he told reporters that he would not block any amendments. The final Senate vote on the pipeline is expected Friday.

6104085228383624198.jpg

Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee member Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., in Washington on Thursday, Jan. 8, 2015.

Virtually all mainstream climate scientists would likely agree with most, if not all, of Sanders' amendment, which is technically known as a "Sense of the Senate" resolution. It would not require that any actions be taken by the federal government, but rather would put senators -- including several newly elected Republicans -- on the record about this particular issue.

6104085238387961714.jpg

Demonstrators opposing the Keystone XL oil pipeline hold banners outside the office of Rep. Brad Ashford, D-Neb., in Omaha, Neb., Tuesday, Jan. 13, 2015.

6104085254013371790.jpg

Image: Nati Harnik/Associated Press

The Democrats intend to use the vote during the upcoming 2016 presidential campaign, when several senators, including Rand Paul of Kentucky, Ted Cruz of Texas and Marco Rubio of Florida, are expected to run. Each of them have expressed doubts that manmade global warming exists, with Rubio going so far as to say he is "not a scientist" in an attempt to address the issue.

There is, however, language in the Sanders amendment that some mainstream climate scientists might disagree with, which is the statement that climate change "has already caused devastating problems in the United States and around the world."

Based on the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's (IPCC) voluminous climate science reports, the most recent of which came out in 2014, it's possible to both recognize the reality of global warming and also conclude that the most devastating impacts are yet to come, with relatively murky links between climate change and disasters in the U.S. to date. The IPCC reports draws clear https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SeXGDDqxg34 connections between climate change and more severe heat waves and heavy precipitation events, but it's not obvious that impacts seen to date have been "disastrous."

This language could give some Republican climate skeptics a scientifically defensible way to oppose the amendment.

The resolution also states:

"A brief window of opportunity exists before the United States and the entire planet suffer irreparable harm; and it is imperative that the United States transform its energy system away from fossil fuels and toward energy efficiency and http://www.pilatesanytime.com/ sustainable energy as rapidly as possible."

Another amendment submitted Tuesday evening by Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) would simply state: "It is the sense of the Senate that climate change is real and not a hoax." Senators may decide to vote on Whitehouse's resolution instead of Sanders', but either way senators would be forced to go on record about climate science findings.

This is not the first time that senators have voted on the existence of global warming, either. In 2005, for example, the Senate approved a "Sense of the Senate" resolution from then-Senator Jeff Bingaman (D-N.M.), which put the Senate on record that global warming is real and that it is necessary to slow, stop and reverse the growth in greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide. An attempt to defeat the amendment failed by a vote of 44 to 53, with 12 Republicans joining Democrats to support the amendment.

A decade later, with the scientific findings far more solid than they were in 2005, there is a strikingly sharper political divide on the mere existence of global warming, let alone the solutions to it, with some senators, such as John McCain of Arizona, having switched their positions during the intervening years.

In the new Republican-led Congress, the debate over the contentious Keystone Pipeline is mainly about scoring points on both sides of the aisle.

Keystone would carry tar sands oil from Alberta southward into the U.S., to join up with an existing pipeline that begins in Cushing, Oklahoma. From there, the oil would flow south to the Gulf of Mexico, where it would most likely find its way to the global market, rather than being burned in the U.S. (Another amendment Democrats plan to offer to the Keystone bill would prohibit the oil from being exported.)

Republicans are seeking to put political pressure on the White House to approve the pipeline, which they say would create jobs. The House voted in favor of Keystone for https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SeXGDDqxg34 a 10th time earlier this week, but President Obama has threatened to veto any bill that forces his hand on the issue. The State Department is still reviewing the proposed project, and environmentalists have staunchly opposed it, turning it into a litmus test of the White House's commitment to fighting climate change.

Another factor in pipeline politics is tumbling oil prices that have reached lows not seen since at least 2009. These prices are forcing Canadian oil companies to cut back on their projects and shed jobs, potentially killing the Keystone project even if it were approved.

For example, on Tuesday, Suncor, which is the largest Canadian oil company by market value, announced plans to cut $1 billion in spending and 1,000 jobs during the next year https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SeXGDDqxg34 due to the drop in oil prices, which has made many drilling projects in Canada's Tar Sands of Alberta unprofitable.

http://mashable.com/2015/01/13/senate-vote-manmade-global-warming/


How To Have A Flat Stomach Like Jessica Alba - Belly Fat secrets Of Celebrities Revealed

How to obtain that Flat StomachIt is certainly one of biggest otherwise the biggest symbol of sexiness which you can obtain in your life and I am talking concerning the 6-pack abs. To obtain a flat stomach and keep it, most men and women take a lot more than 1 week and potentially greater than a month. Flattening your stomach is exactly about reducing the amount of body fat that you're carrying inside the mid section.   Every guy wants it and ladies want to have that flat, tone, and tight stomach as well. Everyone really wants to see results fast and are wondering how to get those great washboard abs that are the envy of us all.

Do not literally copy her. It helps your stomach get a firming boost. This will mean that your body fat is burnt off quicker and your metabolism can be raised.

Sweating is a good sign that you might be burning away the fat. Each each meal of your meal will contain only natural products. You need to focus on your abdominals. Do Away with Junk Foods and Soda.

6089885999569834972.jpg

Don't over-strain your abdominal muscles. To tone your belly fast, you should regularly twist your body from the trunk upwards, once towards the best and once towards the left and you should increase your speed with practice. Everyone can attain this goal, even though it is good to know that not everybody have the same form of muscles. Don't believe you can skimp around the exercise routines one day and make up for this the next.

Calorie shifting diet does not require any artificial means of assistance to shrink belly fat. How much pounds would you recommend losing per week?With a healthy approach to weight loss, you should drop 5 pounds per week in average people.   This is what a great deal of people don't understand. Before you understand it, you may make that happen flat stomach fast. Hearing what others say may be the easiest way to have a idea about it.


Having acid reflux during insanity workout?

Blocked content found.