1. Welcome to kiwibox

    We're happy that you are part of our community. Please take a few minutes discover how kiwibox works.

    You want to explore kiwibox on your own? No problem. You can easily restart the tour at any time by using the sidebar if you change your mind.

  2. Logo

    A click on the kiwibox Logo brings you back to the startpage. Besides a menue with a lot of useful links opens if you mouse over.

  3. Notifications

    You may find all of your news, friendship requests and messages up right in the navigation bar.

  4. Settings

    Just mouse over a post and the gearwheel will appear. Here you'll find all the settings for your news.

  5. Supermodul

    The supermodul summarizes various contents. Enjoy exploring!


zionoifw358   , 32

from Los Angeles


11 Ways to Completely Ruin Your Mirrorless Camera

If you remain in the market for a new SLR, chances are you are considering a cam from Canon, Nikon, or Sony. A number of you will certainly already have lenses, flashes, and also other devices that you have actually purchased which will inevitably force you to stick to the brand you chose. And while this is not very interesting, the business are so close in high quality and also showcases that you really typically aren't missing much either. For those of us looking to start our SLR body as well as lens collection, the decision can seem complicated - if not impossible. I occur to match this group. I have actually marketed all my SLR equipment to money other digital photography projects over the last couple years. I used to own an Olympus E-3 as well as a Sigma SD9. I loved both of these outfits (specifically the Olympus lenses) yet decided to offer them anyway. Looking back, I have actually figured out that, for me, the 4/3's sensing unit is better off in the micro line of video cameras. While Olympus' lenses are fantastic, the sensor could not hold up to the quality of the rivals full framework sensors. The Sigma SLR's, I believe still have several of the most effective picture top quality you can obtain. However, if you shoot higher that ISO 200 you will certainly not like the outcomes from their video cameras. How do we select in between the three various other major companies?


When considering Nikon, a couple of details standout over the competition: high ISO efficiency, construct, as well as use. Nikon cameras are still the leader in high ISO performance, each camera in their line (the exception maybe being the D3100) has best-in-class efficiency. The Nikon D3S could shoot photos at 12,800 ISO that look as noise-free as ISO 800 with Sony's A900. The disadvantage? Nikon video cameras have extremely low resolution, the most affordable of all three companies by a huge margin. The D3s for instance, has 12 megapixels. The Canon competitor, the 1D Mark IV, has 16.1 (Sony does not have a direct competitor for this camera). The D700 likewise only has 12 megapixels, while the offerings from Canon as well as Sony are over 20. Larger prints are mosting likely to be a lot more tough with Nikon, however unless you're publishing mural dimension prints this most likely will not matter to you.

The construct quality of Nikon cams is outrageous. A lot of are undestroyable bricks that never ever feel low-cost or lightweight. Simply hold the D700 as well as the Canon 5D Mark II together, the construct top quality isn't also shut. Nikon's likewise are more contoured to human hands as well as the majority of users concur they are a lot more comfy to utilize compared to Canon over the long run. Sony is most likely equivalent in convenience to Nikon (as well as really close in develop top quality). The downside to this is that Nikon's are normally extremely hefty. The Canon 5D Mark II is 1.79 lbs, the Sony A850 is 1.875 lbs, however the Nikon D700 is 2.19 pounds! While the distinction doesn't seem like that much, you will most definitely observe the distinction over an entire day.

Nikon individuals regularly, as well as irritatingly, teach about the use of Nikon's. I'm talking with you Ken Rockwell! As annoying as this can be, the truth is that they are right. Nikon's are much faster to utilize in the field than Canon and Sony. From not having to push play to analyzing the images you simply fired, allowing basically all functions be accessed with one hand, Nikon's handle extremely well. But, up until the most current Nikon D7000 they did not have the capability to conserve ALL camera settings in a quick access personalized setup. You have 3 custom shop banks in both Canon and also Sony specialist electronic cameras (the brand-new Nikon D7000 still only has 2).


Canon's strong points are price, performance/resolution proportion, and a trusted background. Canon's lenses are normally reasonably priced when contrasted to the competition. While Nikon is insanely pricey, Canon always seems to have the comparable offering at a lower rate factor. The Canon 35mm f/1.4 lens is $1,369 at B&H Image, while Nikon's 35mm f/1.4 lens is $1,799 (I'm not adding Sony's choice below due to the fact that, in my viewpoint, the Sony version is much substandard. When the Sony Zeiss 35mm f/1.4 is released then that will certainly be a true test).

Canon's bodies are possibly the leaders when it pertains to the comparison of efficiency vs resolution. The higher the resolution the cam has, the lower the structures per second (FPS) as well as even worse it carries out at high ISO's. Canon's 1D Mark IV does a really good job at high ISO's and with FPS nevertheless it is still at a quite high resolution of 16 megapixels. The D3S as stated over is just 12. With Canon, you get the most effective of both worlds... kind of. If you pick Canon, you are making giving ins on both sides (high ISO and also resolution) but have respectable efficiency from both. While Nikon will provide better high ISO efficiency as well as Sony's resolution and information is much better, Canon is still rather great at both. So if you locate the efficiency of Canon bodies excellent enough for your requirements in these 2 elements compared to they are the way to go.


Canon also has actually a long trusted history, that is backed by the most specialist individuals. You recognize Canon will be around, will continuously produce brand-new products and also aim to produce new technologies. With Sony, they are reasonably brand-new to the game and you can't be as certain concerning just how they will certainly sustain their line in the long run.



Sony is an interesting animal, due to the fact that they appear to reveal the most promise yet are additionally the most behind. Sony's advantages are great Zeiss glass, amazing resolution, as well as superior body and viewfinder feel. Sony has an agreement with Zeiss, and also hence Zeiss creates auto-focus lenses for Sony SLR's that are far better than the comparable Nikon as well as Canon offerings. They are superb. There are not that numerous Zeiss lenses at the moment. To day, they have made a 24mm f/2, a 85mm f/1.4, a 135mm f/1.8, a 24-70mm f/2.8, a 16-35mm f/2.8, and also a 16-80mm zoom (which is not excellent). That may look like a whole lot of lenses, however there are way too many openings at the moment. Zeiss is recognized for terrific primes, and I just fire primes so I can care less about the zooms. With the Zeiss prime we only have 24mm, 85mm, and 135mm lens choices. Until 35mm as well as 50mm f/1.4 lenses are included to the lineup, in addition to a macro lens after that the lineup is insufficient. Thankfully, Zeiss has had some seminars revealing they plan to earn many brand-new lenses and I presume these will be component of the roll-out this year. The Sony lenses, including the G-series lenses are primarily unsatisfactory with the very best from Canon and Nikon. The only exception is the 300mm f/2.8 prime, which is an amazing lens. I must also state that there is no super-telephoto prime as of yet, however the 500mm f/4 prime was revealed, which if it is just as good as the 30omm will be an excellent lens for sports as well as wild animals photographers.

Sony's resolution and also information is greater compared to the competitors, there isn't much to argue versus this. The pictures the Sony bodies produce (with great glass) are remarkable. At the minute their Pro SLR's obtain loud even at ISO 400, which is means as well reduced contrasted to the competitors. So shooting in dim light is complicated on expert Sony cams. Nevertheless, their most recent customer offerings consisting of the a-33 and a-55 (in addition to the NEX-5) have wonderful high ISO performance. So hopefully this signifies Sony finding out the best ways to manage the sound as well as their refresh of the a850 and also a900 will be far better at high ISO.

Sony's bodies are very well developed, really comfortable, and the viewfinders are the brightest I have actually seen. They also manage to maintain the weight in control (unlike Nikon) which is a wonderful indicator. There truly are no negatives to just how Sony's manage, various other compared to they are a bit heavier than the Canon rivals.


Well that all depends (I recognize you despise that). I'm not going to cop-out and also claim it's actually up to you and also not give a conclusive choice; I despise when various other writers do that. I have actually broken down the pros as well as cons of every electronic camera brand, your demands could be different than mine. Nevertheless, at this point I would certainly select Sony if you are starting brand-new. With the combination of Zeiss lenses, promising line up of telephoto primaries, wonderful handling, as well as high resolution there aren't many negatives to explain. The main concern with Sony is high ISO performance, which they seem to be remedying in their brand-new electronic camera releases. So, what I would do is purchase a Sony a55 as well as a Zeiss lens. As well as await the a850/a900 to be upgraded and afterwards buy that as your Pro SLR.